Neoreviews
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Take the CME quiz:
Vol. 10 No. 6, June 2009
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-Letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Partridge, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dickey, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Partridge, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dickey, B. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

NeoReviews Vol.10 No.6 2009 e270
© 2009 American Academy of Pediatrics

Decision-making in Neonatal Intensive Care

Interventions on Behalf of Preterm Infants

John Colin Partridge, MD, MPH*
Brian J. Dickey*

* Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif

This review traces the history of judicial and legislative interventions into proxy decision-making by parents and physicians on behalf of neonates in intensive care units. The doctrine of parens patriae is traced from the first governmental intrusions into life-support decisions for newborns who had congenital anomalies during the 1980s to the 2002 federal legislation on the legal status of "born-alive" infants. Ethical problems inherent in decisions to resuscitate and provide neonatal intensive care for extremely preterm infants are discussed. A formal shared decision-making approach to care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) could limit the need for legal or legislative intrusions into the complex decisions about the appropriateness of care for infants born at the margin of viability.

Abbreviations: AAP: American Academy of Pediatrics • BAIPA: Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002, Public Law 107–207 • DHHS: Department of Health and Human Services • CAA: Child Abuse Amendments of 1984 • CAPTA: Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act • EMTALA: Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act • NICHD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development • NICU: neonatal intensive care unit


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.