HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Take the CME quiz: Vol. 5 No. 11, November 2004 Author Disclosures E-Letters: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when E-Letters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boyle, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Boyle, R. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

NeoReviews Vol.5 No.11 2004 e477
© 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics

Paradigm Cases in Decision Making for Neonates

^* Professor of Pediatrics, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Va

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

	Objectives

 
After completing this article, readers should be able to:

1. Describe potential problems with interpreting legal cases relating to neonates who have disabilities.
   
2. Trace the evolution of legal decisions regarding neonates who have disabilities.
   
3. Describe the Baby Doe rules and their ultimate revision.
   

	Overview

 
Just as clinical practices, methods of diagnosis and therapy, and technology have evolved dramatically over the past 40 years in neonatology, so too have the ethical and legal dilemmas that clinicians face. This evolution is not peculiar to perinatology and neonatology; it also has occurred in pediatric and adult intensive care. Clinical situations that raised serious ethical questions 20 years ago are now common, everyday clinical events (eg, do not resuscitate orders, withdrawal of mechanical ventilation or dialysis, withdrawal of gastric feeding tubes).

The history of the important or "classic" or "paradigm" cases in a field reveals much about how the issues have evolved, how clinical decisions are made today, what factors are currently seen as important in a case, who should participate in decisions, how much power each decision maker has in a decision, and why clinicians behave the way they do. Some of the important cases progressed through state or federal legal systems; some cases were tried in the criminal system and others in the tort system. Many, however, appeared as interesting or provocative case reports and discussion in the literature. Especially for those that have been decided in the court system, each case often is used as an example of a key legal or ethical principle or a revolutionary event or phenomenon in clinical decision making. Unfortunately, this frequently represents an oversimplification, at times a misrepresentation, of what can be complex issues, in which the primary issues that raised the profile of the case may not finally be the issues for which the case becomes . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C. Partridge and B. J. Dickey Decision-making in Neonatal Intensive Care: Interventions on Behalf of Preterm Infants NeoReviews, June 1, 2009; 10(6): e270 - e279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]