Neoreviews
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Versión de esta artículo en PDF
Right arrow Original Article
Right arrow Author Disclosures
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-Letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Philip, A. G.S.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Philip, A. G.S.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

NeoReviews Vol.5 No.2 2004 e29
© 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics

Historical Perspectives

Immediate Feeding of Preterm Infants

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.


    Introduction
 
In 1985, Thomas E. Cone, Jr, published his book History of the Care and Feeding of the Premature Infant. (1) In it, he provides a detailed historical perspective of the management of infants in the preceding century. One of the areas that set pediatricians apart in the first half of the 20th century was the attention they gave to feeding and nutrition. However, feeding the preterm infant was long considered a difficult task, with many differing opinions. In a recent Historical Perspectives, we highlighted how some of the difficulties were circumvented by the introduction of total parenteral nutrition, with a commentary by Heird and Driscoll. (2)

This month’s perspective is provided by Dr. Pamela Davies, who collaborated with Dr. Victoria Smallpeice to introduce very early enteral feeding with human milk in preterm infants in 1964. (3) With the benefit of 40 years of hindsight, it may be difficult to appreciate how "against the grain" this approach was. Dr. Davies has been retired for more than 10 years now, but recalled their original contribution in an article published in 1991, (4) a significant portion of which (at her suggestion) we produce (with permission).

Although parenteral nutrition remains the preferred method for early feeding of the extremely low-birthweight infant (<1,000 g), an increasing tendency in recent years has been to introduce small amounts of enteral feeding to these tiny babies early in the postnatal period. Such "minimal enteral" or "trophic" feedings seem to provide benefits such as improved milk tolerance, better postnatal growth, and reduced rates of sepsis. (5) The research by Smallpeice and Davies dealt with babies whose birthweights were 1,000 to 2,000 g. In the upper half of this weight category, it is now "standard practice" to provide early . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Alistair G.S. Philip, MD, FRCPE, Co-Editor, NeoReviews

Pamela A. Davies, MD, FRCP, HON. FRCPCH, DCH, Co-Editor, NeoReviews


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.