HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Take the CME quiz: Vol. 6 No. 5, May 2005 E-Letters: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when E-Letters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by desRobert, C. Articles by Neu, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by desRobert, C. Articles by Neu, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

NeoReviews Vol.6 No.5 2005 e211
© 2005 American Academy of Pediatrics

Neonatal Nutrition and Consequences on Adult Health

Clotilde desRobert, MD^*
Robert Lane, MD
Nan Li
Josef Neu, MD

^* University Medical Center of Nantes, Hôpital Mère-Enfant, Nantes, France
University of Utah Medical School, Division of Neonatology, Salt Lake City, Utah
University of Florida, Shands Children’s Hospitals, Gainsville, Fla

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

	Objectives

 
After completing this article, readers should be able to:

1. Describe aberrations in adult health that can result from nutrition in the fetal period and in neonatal life.
   
2. Review the results of studies from human neonates regarding early nutritional interventions designed for "catch-up" growth.
   
3. Review results from animal studies regarding early nutrition and "programming" for adult metabolic syndrome.
   
4. Describe some of the potential epigenetic mechanisms that may be responsible for "programming."
   
5. Examine methods for preventing growth delays, the consequences of undernutrition, and the metabolic syndrome related to adverse "programming."
   

	Introduction

 
One of the traditional goals of neonatal nutrition is to maintain growth within standardized limits. In the preterm infant, growth between the 10th and 90th percentiles of intrauterine rate has been an ideal goal. More recently, maintenance of lean body mass and bone density; prevention of complications such as chronic lung disease, necrotizing enterocolitis, and infection; and optimization of neurodevelopment and adult health through early nutritional programming have become recognized as more meaningful goals than mere somatic growth.

To meet these goals, current nutritional practices require thorough scrutiny in terms of quantity and quality (composition) and how they are customized, if not for the individual patient (which would be ideal), at least for subgroups such as those who are small or appropriate for gestational age, sick or healthy, preterm or term, or male or female.

Fetal nutrition and development frequently are used as a template for the low-birthweight infant. A large body of literature on the consequences of fetal undernutrition shows that infants born small for gestational age (SGA) not only have short-term morbidity, but long-term morbidity manifested in what has been termed the "metabolic syndrome." This syndrome includes abdominal obesity, arterial hypertension, and insulin resistance. Other clinical manifestations can be observed, including thyroid dysfunction, hirsutism, ovarian hyperandrogenism and infertility, dyslipidemia (increased . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?