Neoreviews
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-Letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ikeda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ikeda, K.

NeoReviews Vol.7 No.10 2006 e511
© 2006 American Academy of Pediatrics

International Perspectives

Recent Short-term Outcomes of Ultrapreterm and Extremely Low-birthweight Infants in Japan

Kazushige Ikeda, MD*
Shinya Hayashida, MD{dagger}
Isamu Hokuto, MD*
Satoshi Kusuda, MD{ddagger}
Hiroshi Nishida, MD{ddagger} on behalf of the Japan Neonatologist Association

* Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
{dagger} Division of Neonatology, Aiiku Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
{ddagger} Maternal and Perinatal Center, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.


    Background
 
Since 1984, Tokyo Women’s Medical University has played a pioneering role in improving the treatment results of ultrapreterm infants in Japan. The results were cited in the newest edition of Avery’s Neonatology: Pathophysiology & Management of the Newborn. (1) Like many western countries, the survival rate of extremely low-birthweight (ELBW) and very low-birthweight (VLBW) infants improved in Japan in the 1990s, with the spread of new treatment methods such as surfactant therapy, new methods of mechanical ventilation such as high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), and prenatal steroid therapy. (2) The Committee on Newborn Infants, Japan Society of Pediatrics, has performed nationwide surveys on the outcomes of ELBW and VLBW infants for reports on the current status of neonatal intensive care units and overall neonatal mortality in Japan at 5-year intervals since 1980. The mortality rate of infants weighing less than 1,000 g at birth significantly declined in the previous 2 decades from 55.3% in 1980 and 28.2% in 1990 to 17.8% in 2000 (Table). In view of this, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of the Japanese government changed the definition of the threshold of viability in the Maternal Protection Law from 24 weeks of gestation to 22 weeks of gestation in January 1991. After this change, neonatologists in Japan have increasingly intervened in deliveries at 22 to 23 weeks of gestation.


Table. Survival Rates of Infants Weighing Less than 1,500 g at Birth in Japan

Year Number of Survivors/Number of Admissions

<500 g 500 to 999 g 1,000 to 1,499 g

1980 0/0 493/1,102 (45%) 2,633/3,319 (79%)
1985 5/52 (10%) 1,085/1,846 (59%) 3,695/4,180 (88%)
1990 9/50 (18%) 1,462/2,000 (73%) 3,524/3,786 (93%)
1995 39/132 (30%) 1,789/2,298 (78%) 4,139/4,355 (95%)
2000 57/153 (37%) 2,238/2,638 (85%) 4,844/5,036 (96%)

Although Sumida and associates (3) and Tsuchida and colleagues (4) reported in 1999 and 2001, respectively, survival rates at 22 weeks’ gestation of approximately 30%, their results were published in Japanese, and the number of patients was small. At the Hot Topics in Neonatology conference (Washington, DC) in 2002, Nishida reported the outcomes of infants . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.