Neoreviews
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Take the CME quiz:
 Vol. 7 No. 8, August 2006
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-Letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dutta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Albanese, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dutta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Albanese, C. T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

NeoReviews Vol.7 No.8 2006 e400
© 2006 American Academy of Pediatrics

Minimal Access Surgery in the Neonate

Sanjeev Dutta, MD, MA*
Craig T. Albanese, MD*

* Division of Pediatric Surgery, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, Calif

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.


   Objectives
 
After completing this article, readers should be able to:

  1. Review physiologic, anatomic, and technical issues related to minimal access surgery in the neonate.
  2. Describe conditions in which minimal access surgery can be used in neonates.


   Introduction
 
Historically, pediatric surgeons were slow to adapt to minimal access surgery (MAS) techniques compared with the adult surgical community. However, MAS now is widely established in infants and children. Differences in size and physiology have necessitated a number of surgical and technological modifications to apply MAS techniques to this population. This review outlines the important differences between children and adults with respect to MAS and provides examples of the use of MAS for diseases seen in infants.


   General Considerations for MAS in the Infant
 
     Physiologic Issues
The physiologic response to pneumoperitoneum in children is more pronounced than in adults. Peritoneal insufflation with carbon dioxide has been shown to cause hypercarbia, acidemia, and decreased oxygenation in the pediatric piglet model. (1) In infants, however, there is no detrimental effect on blood pressure, heart rate, or oxygen saturation during short periods of pneumoperitoneum, and elevations in end-tidal CO2 can be counteracted readily by increasing the minute ventilation. (2) Hypercarbia-induced pneumoperitoneum in infants is associated with changes in cerebral blood flow and cardiac output. Nevertheless, laparoscopic procedures have been performed safely with proper anesthetic management in children who have even severe congenital cardiac abnormalities such as hypoplastic left heart syndrome. (3) Hypothermia also can be a concern due to rapid insufflation of unwarmed CO2 gas, mandating the moderation of flow rates. (4)

     Anatomic Issues
A number of anatomic factors set children apart from adults and must be accounted for when performing laparoscopic surgery in this age group. Young children and infants have thinner abdominal walls than adults, so extreme care must be exercised when placing trocars. Due to the small size . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.