|
|
|||||||||
|
|
NeoReviews Vol.8 No.7 2007 e275
© 2007 American Academy of Pediatrics
* Neonatal and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital de Cruces and University of the Basque Country, Barakaldo-Bilbao, Spain, on behalf of the Steering Committee of EuroNeoStat project (see Appendix)
Abbreviations: ANZNN: Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network CLAP: Centro Latino-americano de Perinatología (WHO/OMS) CNN: Canadian Neonatal Network CRIB: Clinical Risk Index for Babies DG SANCO: Direction General of Public Health and Consumer Protection of the European Commission EC: European Commission ESN: European Society for Neonatology ESPR: European Society for Paediatric Research ICONN: International Collaboration of Neonatal Networks NICHD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (USA) NICU: neonatal intensive care unit SEN: Sociedad Española de Neonatología SIBEN: Sociedad Ibero-americana de Neonatología VLBW: very low birthweight VON: Vermont-Oxford Network WHO: World Health Organization
| The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
| Neonatal Networks |
|---|
Neonatal networking can be defined as collaborative work involving several neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) sharing a common protocol aimed to collect standardized patient data for external audits (benchmarking), clinical trials, and quality of care improvement projects.
The first example of successful neonatal networking appeared in 1953, when the National Institutes of Health sponsored a clinical trial of the restriction of supplemental oxygen delivery to very low-birthweight (VLBW) infants. It was performed in 18 NICUs and resulted in a sharp decline in the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity leading to blindness. (1) Since then, a large number of sufficiently sized, well-designed, randomized clinical trials have been conducted and published, exerting a strong impact on neonatal care throughout the world. (2)
Other neonatal networks have been established as stable, ongoing organizations that have wider missions, not only to perform high-quality clinical research but to promote excellence in clinical practice by the use of standardized comparisons of outcomes, teaching and training of health personnel involved in neonatal care, and setting of high standards for the care of preterm infants. Such networks are supported by public funds (eg, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [NICHD] Neonatal Network (3) and the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network [ANZNN] (4
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |