Neoreviews
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-Letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Philip, A. G.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Philip, A. G.S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

NeoReviews Vol.9 No.1 2008 e3
© 2008 American Academy of Pediatrics

Commentary

NeoReviews.org

Past, Present, and Future

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

As we begin a new year, it seems appropriate to assess where we stand. Not everyone will remember that NeoReviews.org developed as an offshoot of Pediatrics in Review (PIR). In 1999, our first six issues were published in print in PIR. Since January 2000, we have published online only as NeoReviews.org and gradually expanded the content of each individual issue to where we are today.

Regular readers will know that most issues of NeoReviews.org have a theme, with three or four articles selected to provide concise reviews of disorders likely encountered in the daily clinical practice of neonatology. During the past 4 years, we have selected themes that reflect the major areas that comprise the content specifications for the examination of the American Board of Pediatrics Sub-Board of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. In this way, we are able to supplement or expand upon topics covered in the self-assessment section of the journal (NeoReviewsPlus). In addition, we have interspersed some cutting-edge articles on topics that . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Alistair G.S. Philip, MD, FRCPE, FAAP

Editor-in-Chief, NeoReviews.org, Emeritus Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.