Skip to main content
Skip to main content

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search »

User menu

  • Login
  • NeoVideos
  • Alerts
  • Subscribe
  • aap.org

Menu

  • AAP Grand Rounds
  • AAP News
  • Hospital Pediatrics
  • NeoReviews
  • Pediatrics
  • Pediatrics in Review
  • Journal CME
  • AAP Current Policy
  • AAP Career Center
  • Pediatric Collections
  • AAP Journals Catalog

Sections

    • Login
    • NeoVideos
    • Alerts
    • Subscribe
    • aap.org

    Sign up for Insight Alerts highlighting editor-chosen studies with the greatest impact on clinical care.
     New! Preorder 2019 PREP Products!

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    Tools and Links

    NeoReviews
    February 2008, VOLUME 9 / ISSUE 2
    Article

    International Perspectives

    Khalid Yunis, Reem El Rafei, Ghina Mumtaz
    • Article
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • Comments
    Loading
    Download PDF

    Introduction

    Consanguinity is defined as the marriage between individuals who have a common ancestor. Many epidemiologic studies have examined consanguineous marriages and their health impact on offspring. Because related individuals share genes from a common ancestor, homozygosity is favored, and their progeny are more likely to have genetic disorders. Primarily, offspring of consanguineous parents are at a twofold greater risk than offspring of nonrelated parents for autosomal recessive disorders. (1)(2) Advances in genetics have led to a deeper understanding of the impact of inbreeding on the occurrence of genetic anomalies. Studies show that inbreeding is associated with mortality and morbidity in the fetal, neonatal, and childhood stages. Because consanguinity represents a risk factor for the occurrence of many deleterious outcomes, it is of major scientific and public health interest. This article summarizes the primary health-related adverse effects of consanguinity and discusses potential preventive measures.

    Prevalence and Sociodemographic Aspects

    Despite the adverse effects caused by consanguineous unions, such relationships still occur in many countries. Bittles (3) has illustrated the global prevalence of consanguineous marriage (Fig. 1). The prevalence can be divided into three major regions. The first region includes Western Europe, North America, Australasia, and Russia, where only 1% of marriages are consanguineous. The second region includes the Iberian Peninsula, Japan, and South America, where 1% to 10% of marriages are consanguineous. The third region includes most of North and sub-Saharan Africa as well as West, Central and South Asia, where 20% to 50% of marriages are consanguineous. The specific types and rate of consanguineous marriages vary between and within countries. In the Middle East, the overall rate of consanguineous unions varies between 21% in Lebanon (Ministry of Public Health, 1998) and up to 58% in Saudi Arabia. (4) The most common form of consanguineous unions practiced is between first cousins. The rate of …

    View Full Text

    Log in using your username and password

    Forgot your user name or password?

    Log in through your institution

    You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.

    Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 days for US$25.00

    Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

    Offer Reprints

    PreviousNext

     

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    View this article with LENS
    PreviousNext
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Neoreviews.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    International Perspectives
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Neoreviews
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Neoreviews web site.

    Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    International Perspectives
    Khalid Yunis, Reem El Rafei, Ghina Mumtaz
    NeoReviews Feb 2008, 9 (2) e59-e65; DOI: 10.1542/neo.9-2-e59

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    International Perspectives
    Khalid Yunis, Reem El Rafei, Ghina Mumtaz
    NeoReviews Feb 2008, 9 (2) e59-e65; DOI: 10.1542/neo.9-2-e59
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    PDF
    Insight Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Author Guidelines
    • Collections
    • Current Issue
    • CME Quizzes
    • Editorial Board
    • LENS
    • NeoVideos
    • MOC Claiming
    • Overview
    • Past Issues

    Subjects

    • Developmental/Behavioral Pediatrics
      • Developmental/Behavioral Pediatrics
      • Cognition/Language/Learning Disorders
    Back to top

             

    Supported in part through an educational grant from
    Abbott Nutrition, a division
    of Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

    Copyright © 2018 by American Academy of Pediatrics

    International Access »

    Terms of Use
    The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) takes the issue of privacy very seriously. See our Privacy Statement for information about how AAP collects, uses, safeguards and discloses the information collected on our Website from visitors and by means of technology.
    FAQ

     

    AAP Pediatrics