This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
- ACOG:
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist
- aPL:
- antiphospholipid antibodies
- APS:
- antiphospholipid syndrome
- CAPS:
- catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome
- ET:
- exchange transfusion
- FBS:
- fetal blood sampling
- FDA:
- Food and Drug Administration
- GALD:
- gestational alloimmune liver disease
- HDFN:
- hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn
- HLA:
- human leukocyte antigen
- HPA:
- human platelet antigen
- ICH:
- intracranial hemorrhage
- Ig:
- immunoglobulin
- ITP:
- immune thrombocytopenia
- IUPT:
- intrauterine platelet transfusion
- IUT:
- intrauterine transfusion
- IVIG:
- intravenous immunoglobulin
- MCA:
- middle cerebral artery
- NAIT:
- neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia
- NH:
- neonatal hemochromatosis
- PI:
- primary immunodeficiency
- PSV:
- peak systolic velocity
- RCT:
- randomized controlled trial
- RPL:
- recurrent pregnancy loss
- TRALI:
- transfusion-related acute lung injury
Abstract
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was first administered to humans in the 1980s. The mechanism of action of IVIG is still a subject of debate but the pharmacokinetics have been well characterized, albeit outside of pregnancy. IVIG has been used in pregnancy to treat several nonobstetrical and obstetrical-related conditions. However, current evidence suggests that IVIG use during pregnancy can be recommended for 1) in utero diagnosis of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia; 2) gestational alloimmune liver disease; 3) hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn for early-onset severe intrauterine disease; 4) antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) when refractory to or contraindicated to standard treatment, or in catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome; and 5) immune thrombocytopenia when standard treatment is ineffective or rapid increase of platelet counts is needed. All recommendations are based on case series and cohort studies without randomized trials usually because of the rare prevalence of the conditions, the high incidence of adverse outcomes if left untreated, and ethical concerns. In contrast, IVIG therapy cannot be recommended for recurrent pregnancy loss, and the use of IVIG in subgroups of those with recurrent pregnancy loss requires further investigations. For non–obstetrical-related conditions, we recommend using IVIG as indicated for nonpregnant patients. In conclusion, the use of IVIG during pregnancy is an effective treatment in some obstetrical-related conditions with rare serious maternal side effects. However, the precise mechanisms of action and the long-term immunologic effects on the fetus and neonate are poorly understood and merit further investigations.
- Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
Individual Login
Institutional Login
You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your librarian or administrator if you do not have a username and password.
Log in through your institution
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 days for US$25.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.